Jumat, 23 Januari 2009

Are Bundles Of TV, Broadband & Phone Packages Worth It?

Article Updated Monthly: Last Update January 2009

2009 - The Return Of The Year Of The Bundle
While 2006 was the year of so called 'free' broadband with offers from
the likes of TalkTalk and Orange, 2007 was the year of the bundle with
3 for £30 deals from Virgin Media, £26 Surf, Speak and See packages
from Sky and £19.99 phone line rental, broadband and TV offers from
Tiscali.

2008 was dominated by the explosion in mobile broadband sales while
this year, 2009, looks set to be the year of the bundle once again as
consumers look to cut their broadband, phone and TV costs as the
recession hits.

Bundles Now A Major Influence On Our Choice Of Provider
The increased promotion of bundled TV, broadband and phone packages
(like Sky's smaller bills bundle) is certainly influencing our
purchase behaviour with a recent research report from Ofcom stating
that bundling is now the second most important factor influencing our
choice of provider.

However, a raft of questions remain unanswered - questions like 'Are
these bundle offers really as cheap as they say they are?', 'what are
the pros and cons of taking all these services from just one
supplier?' and 'do they really represent good value for money?'

In this article we explore the current broadband, phone, TV and mobile
bundles, providing answers to these questions and more.

What Is A Bundle?
Put simply, a bundle is an offer of two or more services for one
attractive monthly price that is cheaper than buying them separately.
There are many different bundle combinations to choose from. These
range from the popular broadband and phone packages provided by the
likes of TalkTalk and Orange, to the newer bundles from Virgin Media
(credit crunch package), Sky (smaller bills package), BT and Tiscali
that include digital TV and sometimes mobile phone plans - Virgin's
quad play offering has this.

There's also new home broadband and mobile broadband bundles from the
likes of O2 and Orange, together with free laptops bundled in with
mobile broadband packages from Vodafone, T-Mobile and 3.

Why Is There So Much Competition Between Bundle Suppliers?
The convergence of internet, TV and telecoms technologies has
certainly heated up the battle between the bundle providers. Companies
like Tiscali and BT (the latter with their BT Vision 'telly' service)
now offer digital TV services over broadband in an effort to
counteract the threat posed by Sky's entrance into the broadband
market.

But, it's not just technologies and competition driving the bundle
craze - the theory held by the ISP's is that once a customer signs up
to a bundle, there's far less chance of them switching to another
provider as it would be too much hassle and potentially cost a lot of
money. For example, if you sign up to a Virgin Media bundle and later
want to switch back to BT, there's a cost of circa £115 to have your
BT line re-installed, not to mention any contract cancellation fees
that you may incur.

So, not only do ISP's benefit from the increased monthly income they
receive from you for taking a bundle, they'll also likely to benefit
from keeping you as a customer for much longer.

Are Bundles Really As Cheap As They Say They Are?
Bundles aren't necessarily as cheap as their headline marketing
message. For example, take the new Sky Smaller Bills bundle. Available
to 70% of UK households, this bundle includes 3 months free 16Mb
broadband, evening/weekend local and national UK landline phone calls,
plus Sky Talk phone line rental when you take any Sky TV entertainment
pack for £16.50 a month.

However, in the small print, you'll find you have to pay Sky at least
a £30 set up fee, plus £99 if you want a Sky+ box (a standard Sky box
is free). The package rises to £36.50 after 3 months and the Sky Talk
package excludes any daytime calls you make during the week. Calls to
mobiles & international numbers, plus non geographic & premium rate
numbers (those starting 08, 09 and 118) are also excluded so you'll be
paying on top of the £36.50 per month for these as well.

The Sky bundles do have their good points though. You can build a
broadband, phone and TV package to suit your requirements from just
£16.50 a month, while the £10 Sky Talk telephone line rental is
cheaper than BT and Virgin Media. You can also add Sky premium
programmes like the Sky Sports Pack to your bundle and pay from just
£35.50 a month for the whole lot (excluding phone line rental). You'll
also receive a free wireless router so you can enjoy wireless
broadband around your house.

Available to 55% of the UK households on their fibre optic cable
network, the new Virgin Media credit crunch bundle of 3 months free
broadband, phone & TV paints a similar picture. There's a £30
installation fee to pay while the 3 months free do not cover the first
3 months of your contract period. Instead, the free months are in
months one, thirteen and fourteen and is achieved via a £35 credit
applied to your bill. So from month two you'll be paying £35 a month
and you'll have to wait till months thirteen and fourteen to get your
remaining £35 credits - which is fine if you're happy signing up to a
slightly longer 18 month contract.

Like Sky, the Virgin Media bundles do have their positives. The credit
crunch package includes broadband speeds up to 10Mb, Virgin telephone
line rental, free weekend UK landline calls (though like Sky, this
excludes daytime & evening calls during the week), plus access to over
200 digital TV channels. There's also thousands of hours of TV on
demand and access to the BBC iPlayer and ITV Player with Virgin Media
being the only TV service offering these.

It certainly pays to read the small print of the various bundle deals
on offer as its likely you'll end up paying more per month than the
cheap headline price advertised. With additional phone call charges
being the main culprit for this, you may want to consider using a free
internet phone service like Skype, or use your free call minutes on
your mobile to keep your bundle costs low.

Don't forget you can compare all the various bundles offered by Sky,
Virgin Media, BT and all the other major providers by entering your
postcode on our broadband comparison page. Please note, the costs we
show include any installation or activation costs, but exclude your
typical monthly telephone line rental cost of £11 unless where stated.

The Pros & Cons Of Bundling TV, Broadband And Phone Packages With One Provider
There's many pros and cons of bundling your broadband, phone, TV and
even mobile phone with one supplier. We've listed a few of them below
for you to consider:

Bundle pros:

- One bill for all your homes telecommunication needs
- One direct debit
- One point of contact for customer and technical support
- Good value provided you choose the right bundle to suit your needs
and you use the phone call package wisely

Bundle cons:

- Your minimum term contract period with them may be longer than a year
- Should one of your bundle services like broadband have a fault, you
may find it affects the TV and phone services as well
- Potentially bad value for money if you choose a bundle that you
don't use enough (e.g. you never watch the 200 TV channels), or you
don't use the phone calls package wisely
- Over dependence on one supplier which is not great if it has poor
customer service

Do Bundles Really Represent Good Value For Money?
In a nutshell, yes - provided you sign up to the right bundle to suit
your needs, you use all the services it includes like the numerous TV
channels and most importantly, you use the calls package wisely. The
headline savings you can make by buying a bundle compared to the cost
of buying broadband, TV and phone separately are clear, it's just how
you use the bundle that dictates whether you get real value for money.

You need to ask yourself whether you really need over 200 digital TV
channels or whether you could make do with a cheap Freeview box with
circa 40 channels that comes with no monthly fee. You need to remind
yourself not to make unnecessary phone calls during the day if your
phone package only covers evening or weekend UK landline phone calls.
If you have a mobile on a contract basis, make use of your monthly
call minutes to make phone calls, or if your considering a bundle that
includes a mobile tariff, make sure you check how many free minutes
and texts you get.

A Future Filled With Bundles?
As technology changes, we're likely to see more bundles coming on to
the market that include the likes of mobile TV and mobile broadband.
Most of these will be good value for money if we use them wisely - the
problem is in many cases we won't and that's what the providers rely
on to make their profits.

What Do I Do Next?
Now you've read our guide on broadband, phone, TV and mobile bundles,
the next step is to visit our broadband comparison page where you can
enter your postcode and search for various bundle combinations offered
by the UK's broadband providers. You'll be able to compare speeds,
download limits, contract lengths, costs per month and first year
costs for all the bundles available where you live.

See you next month for more advice on bundled TV, broadband and phone packages.

Important Note - Please Read
Please note we are able to provide this impartial advice on bundles
and our comparison service to you for free because we receive a small
commission from the internet service provider you sign up with - which
means we are funded by your actions. This only happens when you click
on the orange coloured 'go to site' buttons on this website, so if
you're going to order a broadband deal or bundle, please return to
this site to do so. This will help us to continue to provide this free
independent service for you. You do not pay any extra for your chosen
suppliers package or bundle by signing up through this site.

If you're unsure as to some of the terms used on this page, please
read our beginner's guide to broadband or our guide to switching
supplier.

Like this guide to broadband, phone, TV and mobile bundle packages?
Add it to your favourites and share it with others at these
bookmarking and news sites:

ISP Filtering Live Pilot - Questions and answers

The questions on this page relate to the ISP Content Filtering Pilot.
These questions were received from ISPs potentially interested in
participating in the ISP live Pilot to be completed in the first half
of 2009.

Click on the question or scroll down to view the answer to each question.

1. If this Pilot is run as a voluntary opt in service for the
Pilot, how can we guarantee numbers in the timeline you are
requesting?
2. Considering that many vendors are not willing to hold exchange
rate or quotes for extended time, is it expected that we provide a set
quote?
3. For capital expenditure, are the funds available prior to
commencement of the trial?
4. Can an ISP participate without the involvement of actual
customer accounts? For example, would it be possible to only provide
Enex TestLab with filtered and unfiltered test accounts?
5. We understand that the cornerstone of any live internet
filtering trial should be the testing of network degradation and the
ability of a solution to scale. While the current framework allows for
speed degradation testing for a single user or a small group of
filtered users, how is it proposed to measure performance and network
degradation over an entire customer base?
6. Is it the Department's plan to extrapolate performance results
from a very small group of users to a base of several million? If so,
what sort of methodology is planned to perform such an extrapolation?
7. We understand Enex Test Lab has conducted tests for DBCDE on the
alleged extent of over-blocking using IP addresses rather than URLs.
Is the Department prepared to release these findings and the related
methodology?
8. How will complaints from websites claiming they have been
inappropriately blocked (i.e. over-blocking) be managed and by whom?
9. The Pilot includes the assessment of end users' filtering
experience. This will involve a survey of a sample of ISP customers
following their consent. Please elaborate on the form of this survey
and what correspondence/interaction there will be between Enex and ISP
customers. Also, will ISPs get the opportunity to approve this
correspondence?
10. Would ACMA be providing the survey/questionnaire, the draft
seems to indicate we will draw up a survey?
11. We can guarantee delivery of the survey to the participating
customers, however we cannot guarantee the numbers of completed
surveys returned. Therefore, is the funding in anyway tied to numbers
of completed customer surveys returned?
12. Is the Commonwealth prepared to offer a statutory 'safe harbour'
protection or contractual indemnity to participant ISPs who might
otherwise be exposed to litigation risk (including from any over
blocking or wrongful blacklisting)?
13. What assurance can DBCDE provide as to the confidentiality of
commercially sensitive information or customer information ISPs might
provide as part of the Pilot?
14. What are the requirements around security and confidentiality of
the ACMA blacklist?
15. Is the ACMA blacklist in a form that potentially could expose
ISP staff to websites containing child abuse or other illegal content?
If so, what safeguards will be put in place?
16. Will we be able to see the blacklist prior to committing to the Pilot?
17. Does the requirement for prior Departmental approval of
marketing/publicity activities of participants related to the Pilot
also relate to ad hoc media inquiries? Also what will this requirement
involve?
18. Will DBCDE share trial outcomes with participants and consult on
draft conclusions flowing from the Pilot prior to their public
release?
19. At a minimum, a Pilot ISP is to implement the ACMA blacklist,
which is a list of approximately 1300 specific URLs?
20. At a minimum, as part of the Pilot, the only protocol to filter
is web traffic that is exclusively HTTP over TCP port 80?
21. A successful Pilot ISP will receive a copy of the ACMA
blacklist, where the means of implementing the filter is entirely up
to the ISP? It is understood that receipt of the blacklist will
require both successfully joining the Pilot program, and the signing
of some form of confidentiality agreement with the ACMA?
22. At a minimum, is the Department interested in understanding the
impact on internet services that are both filtered and not
filtered...(see more)
23. What is the expected behaviour of an internet service that
attempts to reach blocked content...(see more)

1. If this Pilot is run as a voluntary opt in service for the Pilot,
how can we guarantee numbers in the timeline you are requesting?

The timeline outlined in the Request for Expression of Interest is
indicative and is provided to ISPs to assist them in their decision
making. The Department will discuss with individual ISPs their
requirements, including the timelines needed to participate in the
Pilot. The Department is happy to discuss with ISPs how they propose
to engage their customers in the Pilot.

2. Considering that many vendors are not willing to hold exchange rate
or quotes for extended time, is it expected that we provide a set
quote?

To assist the Department in managing the costs associated with this
Pilot, it is preferable that applicants note in their Application Form
the period for which quotes are valid. Details of any financial
assistance provided will be discussed with ISPs. As noted in the
Request for Expression of Interest, funding is limited.

3. For capital expenditure, are the funds available prior to
commencement of the trial?

The Expression of Interest document outlines the acquittal and payment
process for grants funding. The Department will issue grants payments
no later than 30 days from receipt of a correctly rendered invoice.

4. Can an ISP participate without the involvement of actual customer
accounts? For example, would it be possible to only provide Enex
TestLab with filtered and unfiltered test accounts?

It is intended that every participant in the Pilot will involve actual
customer accounts. However, if—in addition to a live customer
component—an ISP proposes other approaches for testing particular
aspects of filtering or network performance, the Department will
consider these where they could provide useful information to
supplement that gained from the live customer component.

5. We understand that the cornerstone of any live internet filtering
trial should be the testing of network degradation and the ability of
a solution to scale. While the current framework allows for speed
degradation testing for a single user or a small group of filtered
users, how is it proposed to measure performance and network
degradation over an entire customer base?

Scalability is one of a number of variables that the Pilot will seek
to address. Consideration will be given to connection types,
connection speeds, numbers of participating users and the size of
participants' entire customer bases along with future network
expectations.

Depending on the nature of ISP participation, measurements can occur
at a number of points in the network and with the filter enabled,
disabled and removed.

Some closed on-network or lab testing in conjunction with the ISP is
also possible to validate the performance impact of the filter
solution. Where available, the Department will collect information on
historical network performance as well as that gathered over the
course of the Pilot.

6. Is it the Department's plan to extrapolate performance results from
a very small group of users to a base of several million? If so, what
sort of methodology is planned to perform such an extrapolation?

Enex TestLab will engage with each individual ISP in planning and
preparation sessions to detail and agree on the level of participation
and involvement between the parties in the Pilot and address issues
resulting from the different technical platforms and filtering methods
used.

7. We understand Enex TestLab has conducted tests for DBCDE on the
alleged extent of over-blocking using IP addresses rather than URLs.
Is the Department prepared to release these findings and the related
methodology?

Preliminary laboratory testing was conducted to assess the potential
level of over-blocking using IP addresses.

The Department and Enex TestLab will discuss the methodology and
findings of the study with ISPs that actually participate in the Pilot
and are considering using this technology platform.

8. How will complaints from websites claiming they have been
inappropriately blocked (i.e. over-blocking) be managed and by whom?

Dependent on the filtering method chosen by the ISP, mechanisms to
report over-blocking may be built into the solution. Enex TestLab will
perform accuracy and effectiveness testing early in the Pilot for each
solution. If over-blocking is detected Enex TestLab will notify the
ISP and re-test until the matter is satisfactorily resolved before
proceeding.

For participating ISPs that do not have an over-blocking reporting
mechanism, Enex TestLab will engage one-on-one with each respondent
organisation in planning and preparation sessions to discuss and
address such issues.

9. The Pilot includes the assessment of end users' filtering
experience. This will involve a survey of a sample of ISP customers
following their consent. Please elaborate on the form of this survey
and what correspondence/interaction there will be between Enex and ISP
customers. Also, will ISPs get the opportunity to approve this
correspondence?

The ISP filtering Pilot will ideally involve surveying a sample of an
ISP's participating customer base to seek information on the
customer's filtering experience.

The Department is conscious of the need to minimise any impact on both
customers and the ISP. Therefore, the survey will be kept to a minimum
and undertaken electronically where possible. It is proposed that Enex
TestLab will undertake the surveys with the end user.

The Department and Enex TestLab will discuss the survey process and
associated correspondence with participating ISPs, prior to issuing
the survey.

10. Would ACMA be providing the survey/questionnaire, the draft seems
to indicate we will draw up a survey?

Enex TestLab will draft the customer survey in consultation with the
ISP and the Department.

11. We can guarantee delivery of the survey to the participating
customers, however we cannot guarantee the numbers of completed
surveys returned. Therefore, is the funding in anyway tied to numbers
of completed customer surveys returned?

Funding is not contingent on numbers of completed customer surveys.

Funding assistance is related to participation in the Pilot, and
therefore involves reimbursement of some costs associated with:

* procurement of a filtering solution
* installation and configuration of the filtering solution
* costs associated with any required modifications to network
infrastructure.

12. Is the Commonwealth prepared to offer a statutory 'safe harbour'
protection or contractual indemnity to participant ISPs who might
otherwise be exposed to litigation risk (including from any over
blocking or wrongful blacklisting)?

The nature and extent of this issue will depend on the circumstances
of individual ISPs, including the nature of their contracts with their
customers and the approach to filtering proposed. The Department will
discuss this issue with each ISP proposing to participate. The
Department considers that the need for an indemnity from the
Commonwealth has not been established.

13. What assurance can DBCDE provide as to the confidentiality of
commercially sensitive information or customer information ISPs might
provide as part of the Pilot?

The draft Deed of Agreement contains terms regarding the treatment of
confidential information (see clause 7 of the Deed, and item 5 to
Schedule 1).

The Request for Expressions of Interest asks applicants to make
submissions to the Commonwealth about information that they want the
Commonwealth to treat as confidential. The Commonwealth will consider
each submission, and may agree to treat particular information as
confidential.

If the Commonwealth accepts an applicant's claim for confidentiality,
Australian Government officials are subject to a rigorous regime of
statutory obligations restricting their ability to disclose such
information. These statutory obligations include, but are not limited
to, section 13 of the Public Service Act 1999 (which establishes the
APS Code of Conduct), Public Service Regulation 2.1 (which prohibits
unauthorised disclosure by an APS employee of information gained in
the course of APS employment) and section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914
(which makes it an offence for Commonwealth officers to disclose
information in certain circumstances).

The Privacy Act 1988 would also apply to the extent that confidential
information might include personal information.

14. What are the requirements around security and confidentiality of
the ACMA blacklist?

ISPs participating in the Pilot must enter into a non-disclosure
undertaking with ACMA to obtain the blacklist.

The undertaking will acknowledge that the URLs contained on the
blacklist relate to prohibited content under the Broadcasting Services
Act 1992 and that the blacklist is provided in confidence, for the
sole purpose of allowing the participating ISP to prevent access to
the material contained in the blacklist for users of the ISP's
service.

Participating ISPs must not disclose the blacklist to anyone, or for
any purpose, not directly related to the ISP taking the necessary
steps to prevent the users of its services from accessing such
material by way of its participation in the ISP Internet Level Content
Filtering Pilot.

15. Is the ACMA blacklist in a form that potentially could expose ISP
staff to websites containing child abuse or other illegal content? If
so, what safeguards will be put in place?

Participating ISPs are not required to access the material on the
blacklist. Rather, they are required to block access to the URLs on
the blacklist. The blacklist will be provided to participating ISPs in
a password protected file.

16. Will we be able to see the blacklist prior to committing to the Pilot?

The blacklist contains approximately 1300 URLs. The blacklist will not
be provided to ISPs not participating in the Pilot.
17. Does the requirement for prior Departmental approval of
marketing/publicity activities of participants related to the Pilot
also relate to ad hoc media inquiries? Also what will this requirement
involve?

Participants in the ISP Content Filtering Live Pilot will not need to
gain the Department's approval to respond to ad hoc media queries
concerning their participation. However, participants must ensure that
confidential information is not disclosed when answering any media
queries.

Participants must obtain Departmental approval for marketing and
publicity activities relating to the Pilot, including ensuring that
any associated publicity and marketing material acknowledges the
support of the Australian Government.

18. Will DBCDE share trial outcomes with participants and consult on
draft conclusions flowing from the Pilot prior to their public
release?

All outcomes arising from a particular ISP's participation in the
Pilot will be shared with that ISP. All conclusions drawn from the
outcomes of a particular ISP's participation will be shared with that
ISP. The Department has no authority to share outcomes in relation to
one ISP with another ISP.

The final report of the Pilot will not attribute particular outcomes
to a specific ISP.

19. At a minimum, a Pilot ISP is to implement the ACMA blacklist,
which is a list of approximately 1300 specific URLs?

At a minimum, an ISP participating in the Pilot must implement ISP
filtering mechanisms that will filter access to the ACMA blacklist,
which currently contains approximately 1300 URLs.

URLs consist of any single page or image of web content that is
classified as prohibited. Where a particular page(s) or image(s) must
be blocked, other pages or images on that site should not be blocked
where they have not been classified as prohibited.

20. At a minimum, as part of the Pilot, the only protocol to filter is
web traffic that is exclusively HTTP over TCP port 80?

At a minimum, participating ISPs will implement ISP filtering to block
access to URLs that are classified as prohibited and are on the ACMA
blacklist. This consists of page(s) and image(s) of HTTP content. This
requirement does not specify any port for filtering, although it is
acknowledged that TCP port 80 is the normal port for HTTP traffic.

21. A successful Pilot ISP will receive a copy of the ACMA blacklist,
where the means of implementing the filter is entirely up to the ISP?
It is understood that receipt of the blacklist will require both
successfully joining the Pilot program, and the signing of some form
of confidentiality agreement with the ACMA?

Yes.

Upon entering into a Deed of Agreement with the Department to
participate in the Pilot, the ISP will also enter into a
Non-Disclosure Agreement with ACMA to obtain the blacklist. The
undertaking will acknowledge that the URLs contained on the blacklist
relate to prohibited and potentially prohibited content and that the
blacklist is provided in confidence, for the sole purpose of blocking
access to the material contained in the blacklist by the ISP's
customers.

Participating ISPs must not disclose the blacklist to anyone, or for
any purpose, not directly related to the measures taken by the ISP by
way of its participation in the ISP Internet Level Content Filtering
Pilot to ensure that its customers have no access to such material.

22. At a minimum, is the Department interested in understanding the
impact on internet services that are both filtered and not filtered.
This is to include:

1. 'Speed' of services between dial-up (56 Kbps) and 12 Mbps
(broadband), in terms of throughput and latency (delay / lag)?
2. Filtering infrastructure scalability in terms of traffic
volumes, number of customers, and size of the blacklist (entries on a
logarithmic scale: 10^3, 10^4, 10^5, 10^6, etc)?
3. False positive and false negative, expressed as a ratio or
specific hit count?
4. Perceived effort required to bypass or otherwise circumvent the filter?

Ideally, a participating ISP will apply a filtering solution to a
sample of their customer base. Enex will then obtain a sample filtered
service and, simultaneously, a sample unfiltered service from the same
ISP. If this is not feasible, an ISP could provide a 'before
filtering' and 'after filtering' approach using a single connection.

As outlined in the Technical Testing Framework, ISP filtering
solutions will be assessed against a comprehensive range of criteria
including network performance, accuracy, circumvention, user
experience of filtering (including privacy/security issues), costs
associated with introducing ISP filtering, scalability and, where
relevant, effectiveness of additional filter functionalities.

The range of 56 Kbps to 12 Mbps is an indicative range. ISPs can
propose alternative ranges, noting the intention of the Pilot is to
test a range of typical customer access speeds.

23. What is the expected behaviour of an internet service that
attempts to reach blocked content, should:

1. A page showing 'content blocked by filter' or equivalent be
displayed, which would leak the contents of the ACMA list to users?
2. The page to not load, which would probably prompt the end user
to call the ISP's technical support?
3. The attempt to reach blocked content be logged?
4. Something else or a combination of the above happens?

Enex TestLab intends to engage one-on-one with each participating ISP
to agree on the appropriate response. Item c) is not required within
the scope of the trial.

Video Surveillance Dollars Not Just for Security

Video Surveillance Dollars Not Just for Security
Wi-Fi Research Service | Video Surveillance Systems

NEW YORK - October 8, 2008 Contact: Christine Gallen
Contact PR
www.abiresearch.com

Security is the best-known application of video surveillance, but by
no means the only one. Transportation systems and retail are both
promising markets for video surveillance, where its uses extend to
legal liability prevention, customer behavior analysis, and store
design.

Global spending on video surveillance for transportation markets will
jump from about $630 million in 2006 to a projected $2 billion in
2013, while retail will account for a spending rise from about $1
billion in 2006 to almost $4 billion in 2013. According to ABI
Research vice president Stan Schatt, "Transportation and retail
activities are found in every populated region, so video surveillance
markets in both segments are poised for terrific growth."

We have come to expect security-related video surveillance in
airports, but railways, buses, and port facilities are equally
important, and often overlooked, markets. Buses, for example, may have
video surveillance cameras facing both out and in, to provide
documentation of any accidents and to disprove any spurious claims for
"injuries." Firetide, Strix Systems, and Tropos Networks are just a
few of the leading transportation surveillance vendors.

"Shoplifting prevention came first in the retail environment," Schatt
notes, "but new video surveillance technologies enable market
research, so funding for such systems will be available from sales and
marketing budgets." Better cameras and new software mean an ability to
determine what kinds of retail display are most effective. They track
items that are picked up and then put down. They can also analyze
traffic patterns within a store, allowing optimal layout. It is not
surprising that IBM, with its many large retail customers, is one of
the leading vendors in this space, while Object Video leads the field
in analytic software.

"I also see a huge potential market down the road for managed video
surveillance services," says Schatt. "Marketing departments aren't
interested in the technology, just the results, and IT departments
frequently don't really want to get involved."

ABI Research's "Video Surveillance Systems" report provides global
sizing and forecasting for the key components of this market. It also
sizes and forecasts the key vertical markets spurring growth. It forms
part of the firm's Wi-Fi Research Service.

ABI Research is a leading market research firm focused on the impact
of emerging technologies on global consumer and business markets.
Utilizing a unique blend of market intelligence, primary research, and
expert assessment from its worldwide team of industry analysts, ABI
Research assists hundreds of clients each year with their strategic
growth initiatives. For information, visit www.abiresearch.com, or
call +1.516.624.2500

Research

Research

To stay ahead of competitors, you need to be prepared for future
opportunities and setbacks. However, being able to accurately predict
future market trends is not a simple task, as the process requires a
vast amount of time and resources. Fortunately, there are numerous
research companies providing data on the digital industry, on both a
macro and micro level. Research companies produce sector reports for
you to buy, or you can opt to commission an independent research firm
to provide specific data for you. As exit polls of elections often
show, research is rarely 100% accurate, so it is worth checking what
types of methodology each firm uses and assumptions they make before
choosing the most suitable one for your project. Research companies
can collect data in a variety of ways, such as qualitative data from a
panel group of interviewees, or quantitative data based on Web users
IPaddresses or anonymous user data from ISPs or panels. Research
subjects can include market share analysis, consumer behaviour or
extrapolating future market trends as well as more specific topics to
your own needs. Being able to benchmark your performance against
competitors is an invaluable tool, and there are numerous companies
that can provide you with an overview of a sector to put your company
into context with the rest of the market. This type of research can
also help identify the best partners for marketing campaigns and
sponsorships. Other research firms specialise in monitoring customer
behaviour, using both empirical and qualitative methods, which can
help you know your audience better, as well as identify untapped
markets. There are a variety of firms listed here that specialise in a
number of different areas and research methods, to cater for a variety
of data gathering projects.

The State of Broadband Deployment in the US: An In-Depth Analysis of the Latest Research

Special bonus: Registrants can purchase Pike & Fischer's "Market
Brief: Global Comparison of Residential Broadband Speeds" for only
$179 — that's $100 off the regular price. er-generated content is
coming from all kinds of Internet users. Adoption of high-speed
Internet at home grew twice as fast in the year prior to March 2006
than in the same time frame from 2004 to 2005. Middle-income Americans
accounted for much of the in you through their recently published
studies, detailing their methodologies, conclusions and implications
for the broadband industry overall. You'll also have the opportunity
to question our speakers in the live Q&A session following the
program.

Below is a synopsis of the two groundbreaking broadband deployment and
adoption studies that will be presented and reviewed in depth:

Broadband Deployment is Extensive Throughout the U.S., But it is
Difficult to Assess the Extent of Deployment Gaps in Rural Areas (GAO
06-426) Government Accountability Office (GAO) – April 2006 This
report, mandated by Congress and President Bush, details the current
status of broadband deployment and adoption, the factors that
influence the deployment of broadband networks, the factors that
influence the purchase of broadband services by households, and
suggestions to spur greater deployment and adoption overall.

Home Broadband Adoption 2006 - Pew Internet & American Life Project-
May 2006 In its most recent study, based on a survey of over 7,000
American adults conducted between November 2005 and April 2006, Pew
concludes that home broadband adoption is going mainstream and that
uscrease, along with African Americans and new Internet users coming
online with broadband at home.

You'll also hear the latest Pike & Fischer findings on the number of
American households subscribing to high-speed Internet services,
broken down by cable modem versus DSL usersPike & Fischer's review of
recent industry research available regarding broadband deployment and
adoption in the United States.

We tapped experts from both the US Government Accountability Office
and Pew Research Center to walk

What Was Covered:

* Key study findings regarding both the adoption and deployment of
broadband across the United States – presented by the researchers who
led each respective study team
* An overview of the factors that impact broadband deployment and
adoption – including household income, education levels, geographic
location, price and the variety of services
* Challenges that researchers faced and continue to face in
accurately measuring broadband deployment and adoption statistics and
in developing accurate methodologies for doing so
* Implications of study findings on future federal and state
legislative and regulatory activity and on ongoing consumer behavior
* The status of incremental research underway

Who Attended:

* Telecommunications attorneys and policy makers
* Telecommunications vendors and suppliers
* Broadband service providers
* Wall Street Analysts covering telecommunications

About the Speakers:
JayEtta Hecker, Director, Physical Infrastructure Issues, Government
Accountability Office (GAO) – - GAO is the audit, evaluation, and
investigative arm of Congress. JayEtta Hecker directs the Physical
Infrastructure Team, which specializes in reports and testimony that
help Congress oversee programs and funding of federal agencies,
including FCC, DOT, and GSA, as well as entities such as Amtrak and
the US Postal Service.

John B. Horrigan, Ph.D., Associate Director for Research, Pew Internet
& American Life Project - - John Horrigan studies the online behavior
of broadband Internet users and consumers of other leading edge
information technology. He also leads Pew's research on the Internet's
impact on people's social networks and news gathering habits. He
received his Ph.D. in public policy from the University of Texas at
Austin and his B.A. in government and economics from UVA. In addition,
Horrigan is a member of the board of the Telecommunications Policy
Research Conference, where he serves as Treasurer. Horriganhas taught
as an Adjunct Professor of Government at the University of Texas at
Austin's Washington Campus, the Archer Center.

Moderator: Scott Sleek, Director, Pike & Fischer's Broadband Advisory Services -

High-Speed Europe

From Berkshire to Berlin, people are signing up for broadband at
record rates. It's changing how they live

Douglas L. Clark has waited a long time for this. The 65-year-old
retired British businessman bought his first personal computer, a
Commodore Pet, in 1979, and ventured online in the late 1980s. But
despite graduating to ever-more-sophisticated computers and software,
Clark could never get the one thing he wanted: a fast, always-on
Internet connection. Then, six weeks ago, his remote hamlet in
Berkshire was finally wired for digital subscriber line (DSL)
broadband.
Click here to find out more!


The $26-a-month service, from discount provider ADSL4Less Ltd., has
already changed Clark's life. He listens to streaming music over the
Net from BlueBeat.com. He posts higher-quality photos on his family
Web site. And he spends more time online perusing pictures of vintage
motorcars he might add to his collection. The downside? Clark admits
sheepishly that he sometimes leaps up from the dinner table in
mid-conversation to look up information on Google (GOOG ).

The besotted Englishman is just one of the more than 14 million
Western Europeans who have signed up for broadband access in the last
year alone, bringing the total number of subscribers to 44 million,
says consultant Pricewaterhouse-Coopers. That's more users than in the
U.S. Some 25% of European households now have high-speed Net access --
enough to qualify as a mass-market phenom. "Broadband has become
mainstream" in Europe, says Charlotte Davies, an analyst with
London-based telecom researcher Ovum Ltd.

It's already a big business for telcos. PricewaterhouseCoopers figures
European clients will spend $24 billion this year alone for zippy
cable and DSL connections, rising to $42 billion by 2008. More
important, broadband is a rocket booster for the rest of the Net
economy. London-based Continental Research found that when British Web
surfers upgrade from dial-up service, they're more than twice as
likely to download music, use instant messaging, or frequent online
auctions. Use of Net radio stations and online games more than
triples. And while a quarter of dial-up users buy books and DVDs
online, the figure jumps to 40% for high-speed subscribers. "Broadband
changes customer behavior and makes it possible to do things that
weren't realistic before," says Nick Hazell, alliances director for
Yahoo! Europe (YHOO ).

The surge of super-surfers is helping plump up results for companies
across Europe. Telcos such as Deutsche Telekom (DT ) and Britain's BT
Group (BT ) are signing up DSL subscribers as fast as they can. France
Telecom, for instance, boosted its DSL subscriber base by 65% in one
year, to 3.4 million as of the end of March, yielding record quarterly
broadband revenues of $410 million. And in the Netherlands, which
leads Europe in broadband penetration at 47% of households, market
leader KPN saw a 51% first-quarter rise in DSL revenues vs. the same
period in 2004, to $131 million.

The broadband effect is most dramatic for companies that specialize in
digital content and services online -- music, games, gambling, and the
like. Take Photoways Inc., the largest European online photo printing
service, based near Paris. "There would be no Photoways without
broadband," says Chief Executive Michel de Guilhermier, who figures
98% of his customers have high-speed connections. A few years ago, he
says, the company's busiest day was Monday, when photo buffs uploaded
their weekend snapshots from their office computers; now, with home
hookups so much more common, the peak time is Sunday evening. The
privately held company doesn't disclose results, but de Guilhermier
says revenues tripled in 2004 and will do so again this year.

A SONG OF SALES
Online music sites are also ringing up record sales. Deutsche
Telekom's T-Online unit has drawn 1.5 million users to its Musicload
service, which sells more than a million downloads per month. Apple
Computer Inc.'s (AAPL ) iTunes is now available in 16 European
countries. And European users listened to 14 million songs in June via
Yahoo's new streaming music service. By 2008, online music could be a
$2.4 billion business in Europe, predicts Forrester Research. Online
viewing of music videos is taking off as well. "We're seeing massive
increases in the numbers of videos consumers are accessing," says
Barney Wragg, senior vice-president of Universal Music Group eLabs in
London.

At the same time, high-speed Net access is changing the way Europeans
communicate. As consumers switch to broadband, many are trying out
phone calls over the Net for the first time using so-called
voice-over-Internet protocol, or VOIP, technology. London-based
startup Skype Technologies, which offers free Net calls PC to PC, has
signed up 47 million users around the world, 82% of them on broadband
connections. U.S.-based rival Vonage launched $17.50 per month
all-you-can-call Net phone service in Britain in May. And mainline
carriers like BT and France Telecom are pushing flat-rate VOIP
packages to combat erosion of their traditional voice services. All
told, figures market researcher IDC, Net-based phone calls may be a
$4.2 billion business in Europe by 2008. "The killer application for
broadband could be telecom," says Greg H. Garrison, director of the
PricewaterhouseCoopers Menlo Park Europe Technology center.

E-commerce benefits from faster connections, too. Richard Ambrose, a
category manager for eBay UK, says broadband customers spend twice as
long on its site. But the real boost is richer graphics and sound
clips. Some sites offer 3-D "fly-throughs" only possible via
high-speed links, such as the virtual real-estate tours on Britain's
findaproperty.com. Milan-based Yoox.com, which sells discount designer
fashions, has a feature that allows users to create custom ensembles.
"Customers enjoy the interactivity," says Chief Technology Officer
Gabriele Tazzari.

The same interactivity is giving a lift to online advertising. Movie
distributors, phone companies, and carmakers, among others, are taking
advantage of faster connections to add animation, music, and even
video to their banner ads. A 2004 report from ad services firm
DoubleClick Inc. found that "rich media" banners drew click-through
rates of 1.17%, nearly twice the level for static ads. "We've seen
some very high response rates with rich media," says Ed Ling, strategy
director for London-based agency i-Level PLC, which specializes in
digital media. Ling cautions that interactive ads still represent less
than 10% of the online market. Nonetheless, PricewaterhouseCoopers
predicts the spread of broadband will help drive European Net
advertising to $8 billion in 2008.

The next wave could be even more disruptive. Broadband surfers are now
starting to create their own rich media, from video blogs to podcasts.
Within a few years, the entertainment and communications businesses
could be dramatically transformed. And you can bet that Doug Clark
will be along for the ride.

Voda Achieves 16Mbps Mobile Broadband

January 15, 2009
Voda Achieves 16Mbps Mobile Broadband

Vodafone says that it has successfully trialled an evolution of mobile
broadband technology, achieving actual peak data download rates of up
to 16Mbps. The high speed data connection was achieved during field
trials of HSPA+ 64QAM technology on Vodafone Spain's network.
Vodafone now plans to trial mobile broadband data connections with
peak rates of up to 21Mbps early in 2009, using HSPA+ MIMO (Multiple
Input Multiple Output) functionality. The company's technicians
estimate that the technology would be capable of delivering a typical
video download experience of more than 13Mbps in good conditions, and
an average of more than 4Mbps across a full range of typical cell
locations, including urban environments. If the trials prove a
success, Vodafone plans to make the technology available in selected
commercial networks.
"Successfully demonstrating a live HSPA+ high speed connection has
been a key milestone in continuing to build confidence in this new
technology," says Vodafone Global Networks Director, Andy MacLeod.
"The results show that HSPA+ technology is well placed to further
enhance our customers' mobile broadband experience through the
evolution of our existing 3G networks."
Vodafone worked in association with Ericsson and Qualcomm to prove the
potential of the technology in the field, following impressive data
throughput rates achieved in laboratory tests.
HSPA+ technology is the next evolutionary step in the (3G) HSPA
roadmap. It increases performance through the use of a more advanced
modulation technique called 64QAM. Performance can be enhanced further
through the use of multiple antennae on both base stations and data
devices (MIMO).
Both 64QAM and MIMO features require new HSPA+ mobile broadband
devices. Vodafone is working with its device vendors on the trialing,
testing and validation of these devices, in preparation for commercial
availability.
At present, Vodafone mobile broadband customers can download data and
surf the net at speeds of up to 7.2Mbps, delivering an internet
experience comparable with fixed broadband. Vodafone expects HSPA+
mobile broadband technology to significantly enhance actual download
speeds as well as customers' overall mobile experience.

Companies Unite for Mobile Broadband Push

Companies Unite for Mobile Broadband Push

16 technology and mobile companies have united behind a GSM
Association (GSMA) initiative to create a new category of
always-connected 'Mobile Broadband' devices, delivering an alternative
to wi-fi. The companies say this will give consumers the freedom to
get online on the move, while enabling operators to address a US$50
billion (£28 billion) opportunity in both mature and emerging markets,
according to figures from Pyramid Research.
Participants in the initiative include 3 Group, Asus, Dell, ECS,
Ericsson, Gemalto, Lenovo, Microsoft, Orange, Qualcomm, Telefónica
Europe, Telecom Italia, TeliaSonera, T-Mobile, Toshiba and Vodafone
In the first phase of the initiative, mobile operators, PC
manufacturers and chipset providers are uniting to pre-install Mobile
Broadband into a range of notebook PCs that will be ready to switch on
and surf straight out of the box in 91 countries across the world.
To support the initiative, the GSMA has created the 'Mobile Broadband'
service mark, a new global identifier which will help consumers easily
identify the array of 'ready-to-run' Mobile Broadband devices. The
Mobile Broadband service mark will be backed by a global media spend
of more than US$1 billion in the next year.
"Mobile Broadband is like a home or office broadband connection with
one crucial difference: freedom," says GSMA Chief marketing Officer,
Michael O'Hara. Freedom from hot spots, freedom from complexity and
freedom from security concerns. Today, 16 of the world's largest
technology companies have committed to change the way people get
online forever.
Integrating Mobile Broadband into notebook PCs is the first step in a
wider strategy to deliver wireless Internet access and management to a
whole range of devices, from cameras and MP3 players to refrigerators,
cars and set-top boxes. However, only devices that offer a truly
un-tethered Mobile Broadband experience will qualify to carry the new
service mark.
The GSMA notes that more than 55 million people currently subscribe to
Mobile Broadband services in 91 countries, a number that the analyst
Wireless Intelligence says will grow by four million per month by the
end of 2008.
"We have seen enormous uptake of Mobile Broadband and see this
initiative as a further boost to its popularity," says Andrew
Sangster, Director of PC Connectivity at Vodafone. "Initiatives that
unite the Mobile Broadband community under a common identifier can
only be good for the customer. Providing a single, simple point of
reference for Mobile Broadband will ensure that the appropriate buying
decision is made every time."

How to start a customer behaviour analysis?

How to start a customer behaviour analysis?

We are going to start supporting the Business intelligence team of the
marketing department of a Mobile operator trying to analyze the
customer behaviour impacting on a revenue drop because of the MOU's
decrease.

As most of the emerging operators in which we are working, there is no
Customer centric culture and therefore, no customer value management
is done. Being asked by our clients on the objectives and methodology
to be applied in the next assignment, we have defined an end-to-end
approach to enable a decision-making tool based on the customer
economics.

This approach will handle the following analysis:

1. Top-down analysis: based on the detailed assessment of monthly
performance, the main factors contributing to top-line deterioration
(e.g., market evolution, competitive dynamics, regulatory compliance,
operator performance, etc.) will be identified and their relative
quantitative impact will be allocated

2. Bottom-up analysis: by looking at the evolution of detailed
operational KPIs, we will be able to draw multi-faceted conclusions to
better pinpoint those areas for improvement. This will allow to
further break down the extent of the operational drivers of revenue
shortfall. Different dimensions need to be taken into account and
crossed:a. Traffic volumes and patterns evolution, by typology (on-net
/ off-net, peak / off-peak, billed / not billed, outgoing / incoming,
etc.); b.Shift of minutes and/or subs to the competitors by analyzing
incoming traffic patterns; c. Revenue loss analysis by customer
segments; d. Regional subs & traffic distribution, by sales channels;
e. Recharges volumes and patterns evolution

For this work, we will start designing the customer behaviour
datamart, based on current datawarehouse and complementing it with
additional sources of information, considering the different needs for
the data (end-user can be several departments, different "historical
data" needs, different product structures…) and that a Datamart is a
"living tool": it should evolve as needs evolve (customer segments,
products, analytical requirements, etc.)

In the particular case of time-series data, it is key to consider not
only what happened in the past but also on what is needed to be
tracked on time, for how long, and with what level of granularity.
This is the first step for defining a customer datamart and to obtain
customer value analysis. The faster we get to the industrialization of
the analysis, the better our decision-making processes will be.

Will keep you posted on how this project evolves. Best regards. CVA

How people find a blog

How people find a blog

eMarketer have an interesting survey "Blog Reading is a Free Floating
Affair" studying how people discover blogs. The study (survey of about
200 respondents) showed that 67% followed links from other blogs.
Recommendations came second at 23%, then search engines 20% then blog
search engines at 5% (multiple responses were allowed).

One hypothesis from this might be that blogs are read by blog people
who search them out in blog-ish fashion. This is also a possible
conclusion from the data about the popularity of the Dilbert blog and
newsletter that I reported a while ago. If so this would be something
you'd want to consider before making a business blog - do you /do you
not want to appeal to blog readers?

But I'm not convinced that the data justify eMarketer's subheading
"Thinking of promoting a blog through search? Don't bother. ". Most of
the respondents in the survey were finding blogs for entertainment
(66%) and for personal interests (43%); with only 33% finding blogs
for education/information and 12% for work or business (multiple
responses were allowed to this question). It may be that they were
looking at a lot of blogs that were run by individuals. And getting
links from other blogs is probably the easiest way for individuals to
spread the word about their blogs. There are several factors to this:

* Comment and trackback features allow a blog owner to make their
own inbound links from other blogs (to an extent, at least)
* There is often an easy-to-find person behind the blog - in my
experience at least, emailing that person (I liked your blog and have
written about it/linked to it) is quite likely to get an interested
response, and perhaps a link (like this link to me, one of my first,
I think). Getting a link from other kinds of websites can be much more
of an effort ("when the webmaster gets around to it")
* Blogging seems easily to lead to posts along the lines that "I
read this on the web and I think it is very true/complete tosh
because..."

By contrast, you have to bother to register for search engines, or be
kindly linked to from a page that already gets visits from robots. I
wonder how many individual bloggers would find it useful to run paid
ads on the engines?

So the survey data may reflect the ways in which many blogs find it
easy or convenient to form links (or what happens when someone
concentrates on writing their blog and doesn't make any real effort to
market it). I'm not at all sure it shows that search doesn't work. My
own blog typically gets more referrals from organic Google listings
than from any single other source (that is Google is less that 50% of
referrals, but is the biggest single slice of the pie. I should say
that I do not expend much effort and no money at all in marketing my
blog, it being mostly for my own professional development.

Do customers desert a site if it takes longer than 4 seconds to load?

Do customers desert a site if it takes longer than 4 seconds to load?

In this post, a closer look at a memorable and alarming statistic
leads to a more general discussion of things that annoy website
customers, and a bit about the questionnaire versus user trials
controversy...

Sometimes I see a statistic that I know I'm going to see quoted a lot.
An example is one from eMarketer in an article called Online Retailers
Face Four-Second Barrier

Now, as the all-important online holiday shopping season nears,
and the competition for online shoppers increases, a new report from
Akamai Technologies advises e-tailers to be on their toes — because a
few heartbeats can make the difference between a sale and a lost
customer.

The research shows that four seconds is the maximum length of time
an average online shopper will wait for a Web page to load before
abandoning one retail site and moving on to another.

"The critical takeaway from this research is that online shoppers
not only demand quality site performance, they expect it," said Brad
Rinklin of Akamai. "Four seconds is the new benchmark by which a
retail site will be judged, which leaves little room for error for
retailers to maintain a loyal online customer base."

The article is quoting a new report by Akami and Jupiter Research
(registration is needed to view the report). It looks like a good
enough piece of work the methodology section of the paper explains:

"In April 2006, JupiterResearch designed and fielded a survey to
online consumers selected randomly from the Ipsos US online consumer
panel. A total of 1,058 individuals responded to the survey.
Respondents were asked approximately 15 closed-ended questions about
their behaviors, attitudes, and preferences as they relate to buying
and researching products and services online. Respondents received an
e-mail invitation to participate in the survey with an attached URL
linked to the Web-based survey form. The samples were carefully
balanced by a series of demographic and behavioral characteristics to
ensure that they were representative of the online population.
Demographic weighting variables included age, gender, household
income, household education, household type, region, market size,
race, and Hispanic ethnicity. Additionally, JupiterResearch took the
unconventional step of weighting the data by AOL usage, online tenure,
and connection speed (broadband versus dial-up), three key
determinants of online behavior. Balancing quotas are derived from
JupiterResearch's Internet Population Model, which relies on US Census
Bureau data and a rich foundation of primary consumer survey research
to determine the size, demographics, and ethnographics of the US
online population. The survey data are fully applicable to the US
online population within a confidence interval of plus or minus three
percent."

When I hear the "new 4-second rule" being quoted at me, though I will
try to remember the following bits from the actual report:

1. "Thirty-three percent of consumers shopping via a broadband
connection will wait no more than four seconds for a Web page to
render." (From Fig 3 of the report:30% of broadband customers said
they would would wait 5-6 seconds, and a further 38% would wait more
than 6 seconds. Only 19% of dial-up customers said they would leave if
a single page took longer than 4 seconds to render).
2. From Fig 2 of the report, in which respondents were asked to
remember what annoyed them about their last unsatisfactory e-tail
experience, slow pages was the third biggest annoyance (quoted by 33%)
compared with high prices (44%) and shipping/handling issues (39%).
Annoyance at the need to register, or "website was
frustrating/confusing" came joint fourth.
3. In Fig 5, customers are asked how they would react to their bad
experience, and this was correlated with what they complained about -
interestingly, there isn't much difference in the reaction of people
who remember a crash from those who found the site too slow or
confusing (or who found the checkout process too slow). The most
likely reaction was to visit the site less often, "purchase from
another online retailer" comes third. I'd have thought that a crash
was worse than slow pages, but maybe not.

Slow-loading pages is of course not a new "annoyance" the eMarketer
article quotes a 2005 study (Taylor Nelson Sofres) in which slow pages
came out as the 5th most popular thing to be ranked by customers as
"extremely annoying" (the top 4 were pop-up ads (84%); requiring
installation of extra software to view the site (72%); Dead links
(66%) and requirement to register before viewing site (61%). I can't
think of anyone who says slow pages are good per se. As usual there's
a trade-off some sites continue to have slow pages because they reckon
the page will work so well when you do see it.

So while having slow pages is not good, it is not quite the stark 4
seconds and you are dead! But I'm going to hear this figure a lot
because while it may not be completely right it is very memorable
enough for a sort of e-marketer's 1066 And All That. At best I guess
it is a rule of a thumb that has been dipped in a pinch of salt.

Actually what seems more realistic to me is an idea from Steve Krug's
book "Don't Make me Think" - imagine the customer arrives at your
website with a reservoir of patience and good will to you and your
business. The initial size of this reservoir depends on a lot of
factors, including their previous experiences with you, their overall
mood and to-do list that day, how motivated they are to do stuff on
your site and so on. Their "good will level" goes up or down according
to how the site treats them - but the point at which goodwill=0 and
they say "aw the heck with it!" is going to vary.

This is probably the point at least to mention that old grip that some
usability study folks have with questionnaire data - that
"self-reported claims are unreliable" (sometimes this is said to be
"Nielsen's first rule"). That is - what people say they thought or
happened is not always how it seems if you watch them. This is one of
the interesting objections raised on a discussion at cre8asite about
whether it was worth putting questionnaires on a website. The "don't
bother" camp seemed to win that debate on that site, a bit to my
surprise - I'd have thought that what customers perceive as reality is
as interesting as what someone else perceives their reality is....

The Annual Review of Broadband Communications

The Annual Review of Broadband Communications focuses on the current
trends and business strategies in this growing field on both a
national and international level. Covering such topics as the
Ethernet, fiber optics, and the powerline, this volume grants the
interested reader a well-rounded, if not privileged, look into the
world of broadband communications. This is a remarkable resource that
has brought together great industry thinkers discussing a variety of
related topics, and it will surely serve as an important reference
tool for executives, educators, and all people belonging to the
information industry.

"The battle for telecom's most profitable customers will be won by
carriers that provide cost-effective and reliable value-added services
such as broadband," says Mitch Mitchell, vice president at A.T.
Kearney and a contributor to the Annual Review. As customer behavior
changes and technology evolves, companies must focus less on the
network and more on the services that their customers demand.
Customers have been presented with a full menu options, and it is the
providers who offer the best combination of winning services and
reasonable costs who will win the day.

With The Annual Review of Broadband Communications as your reference
material, you will learn global perspectives on the issue and will
gain a good knowledge of the impact of broadband communications
worldwide.

Tracking customer behavior: understanding how individuals view Web sites can prevent them from

Tracking customer behavior: understanding how individuals view Web
sites can prevent them from...
By DeFelice, Alexandra
Publication: CRM Magazine
Date: Wednesday, February 1 2006

Online transaction failures that force customers to abandon a
company's Web site can potentially lead to millions in lost revenue. A
recent survey conducted by Harris Interactive, commissioned by
TeaLeaf, shows some commonly experienced transaction mishaps include
error messages (40 percent), a poorly navigable Web site (37 percent),
the inability to complete a transaction due to an endless loop (31
percent), and difficulty logging onto the Web site (31 percent). The
survey found that 89 percent of customers experience such problems and
34 percent of them said they would turn to a
To read the rest of this article, click here to take a free trial highbeam_logo
In addition, make sure to read these premium articles also available
with your free trial:

* The Yankee Group says half of European broadband users are
online more...premium_logo
The Yankee Group's 2003 European Connected Consumer survey shows
broadband-connected consumers are spending much more time online than
those with slower dialup connections. According to ......
* Mobile games: a market poised to "power up".(MARKET
INTELLIGENCE)premium_logo
Newest survey by The NPD Group provides a clear picture of
mobile gamers in the U.S. Mobile gaming is far more than just a fad,
......
* Survey Finds Most Sites Post Privacy Policies.(Georgetown
Internet...premium_logo
The privacy policies on commercial Web sites were part of the
Georgetown Internet Privacy Policy study conducted by a professor at
the business school. The ......
* Survey on global online software purchasing.(IT News)(Brief
Article)premium_logo
Digital River, Inc and element 5 AG, have announced the results
of a global survey they conducted on the online buying habits of
software consumers....
* Mobile data users now representing the mainstream.(Market...premium_logo
With 54 percent of In-Stat/MDR's Consumer Mobility Study
respondents currently using one or more wireless data services, the
hightech market research firm believes wireless data ......
* In-Stat/MDR reports early mobile internet adopters could power
market...premium_logo
With mobile Internet users significantly interested in
accessing, and paying for public WLAN services, cellular carriers may
be in the perfect position to capitalize, according ......
* The debate over offshore service continues: the risk of
customer...premium_logo
In response to customer criticism, Dell and Delta Airlines
recently brought their offshore customer care operations back to the
United States. This could signal a ......
* Statistically speaking.(CRM TRENDS AND NEWS ANALYSIS)premium_logo
* According to a Datamonitor report more than 3,000 call centers
will exit the United States by 2008. Mark Best, Datamonitor technology
analyst and author ......
* Statistically speaking.(CRM TRENDS AND NEWS ANALYSIS)premium_logo
* According to "The Online Shopper Deal Shopping and Value Panel
Study," 59 percent of consumers begin their shopping at aggregator
sites--a 5 percent jump ......
* Mobile video is a tough sell, according to In-Stat.(MARKET...premium_logo
With the emerging availability of mobile video, a recent In-Stat
U.S. mobile phone subscriber survey revealed that one in eight
respondents indicated they were interested ......

Selasa, 13 Januari 2009

benefits consumer research

CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH

There is no one perfect research method. Each has strengths and weaknesses, and thus the appropriate method must be selected based on research needs.

Untuk mengetahui kondisi pasar, sudah sejak lama perusahaan/pemasar melakukan market research atau riset pasar. Dengan semakin meningkatnya keragaman konsumen, dipandang perlu diluncurkannya riset tambahan, yakni consumer research atau riset konsumen.

Seperti telah dijelaskan sebelumnya, riset pasar dan riset konsumen secara umum membantu pemasar untuk mengetahui dengan pasti siapa konsumen mereka, sehingga bisa menjadi kontribusi untuk strategi marketing selanjutnya.

Ada empat manfaat utama Consumer Research

·         Locate new clients

·         Understand existing clients

·         Identify opportunities for new products or services

·         Identify potential markets for new or existing products

Dan Secara khusus, dapat dijelaskan pula   dua manfaat utama riset konsumen,

  1. Memungkinkan para pemasar meramalkan  bagaimana para konsumen akan bereaksi terhadap berbagai pesan promosi
  2. Memahami cara pengambilan keputusan  konsumen, sehingga pada akhirnya pemasar bisa merancang strategi pemasaran  yang lebih baik

Di awal perkembangannya, para periset menggunakan metodelogi kuantitatif yang memfokuskan penelitian terhadap keputusan konsumen yang rasional dan objektif dalam menilai suatu produk. Menurut metode ini, konsumen pasti akan memilih barang yang paling murah tapi memberikan manfaat dan kepuasan tinggi bagi mereka.

Riset yang mengakui adanya factor emosional psikologis dalam proses pengambilan keputusan konsumen, baru dilakukan akhir tahun 1930-a. Dimulai  ketika tahun 1939, psikolanalisis Wina Ernest Dichter mengaplikasikan teknik psikonalitis Freud mengenai adanya factor motivasi dalam diri konsumen. Sejak  awal tahun 1950an, metode risetnya kemudian berkembang  dan menjadi dasar metodologi kualitatif yang kita kenal sekarang.

digunakan, yakni positivisme dan interpretivisme.